Table 3.
Comparison | MG1655 (n=4070) | EDL933 (n=1787) | Sakai (n=373) | CFT073 (n=2486) | Intergenic (n=1297) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | (%) | n | (%) | n | (%) | n | (%) | n | (%) | |
86-24 versus ΔqseE | ||||||||||
Decrease | 871 | 21.40 | 263 | 14.72 | 33 | 8.85 | 127 | 5.11 | 33 | 2.54 |
Marginal decrease | 253 | 6.22 | 93 | 5.20 | 18 | 4.83 | 53 | 2.13 | 10 | 0.77 |
Increase | 558 | 13.71 | 406 | 22.72 | 83 | 22.25 | 235 | 9.45 | 395 | 30.45 |
Marginal increase | 74 | 1.82 | 48 | 2.69 | 5 | 1.34 | 17 | 0.68 | 28 | 2.16 |
No change | 2314 | 56.85 | 977 | 54.67 | 234 | 62.73 | 2054 | 82.62 | 831 | 64.07 |
86-24 versus ΔqseF | ||||||||||
Decrease | 183 | 4.50 | 69 | 3.86 | 9 | 2.41 | 33 | 1.33 | 10 | 0.77 |
Marginal decrease | 280 | 6.88 | 114 | 6.38 | 24 | 6.43 | 37 | 1.49 | 14 | 1.08 |
Increase | 304 | 7.47 | 207 | 11.58 | 50 | 13.40 | 213 | 8.57 | 285 | 21.97 |
Marginal increase | 272 | 6.68 | 134 | 7.50 | 15 | 4.02 | 44 | 1.77 | 65 | 5.01 |
No change | 3031 | 74.47 | 1263 | 70.68 | 275 | 73.73 | 2159 | 86.85 | 923 | 71.16 |
86-24 versus ΔqseG | ||||||||||
Decrease | 332 | 8.16 | 158 | 8.84 | 23 | 6.17 | 38 | 1.53 | 14 | 1.08 |
Marginal decrease | 328 | 8.06 | 140 | 7.83 | 25 | 6.70 | 27 | 1.09 | 17 | 1.31 |
Increase | 300 | 7.37 | 250 | 13.99 | 49 | 13.14 | 176 | 7.08 | 287 | 22.13 |
Marginal increase | 217 | 5.33 | 88 | 4.92 | 15 | 4.02 | 47 | 1.89 | 62 | 4.78 |
No change | 2893 | 71.08 | 1151 | 64.41 | 261 | 69.97 | 2198 | 88.42 | 917 | 70.70 |