Skip to main content
. 2010 May 27;10:137. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-137

Table 3.

False recent seroconverters and protective effect of MC on HIV incidence as calculated using BED and AI separately

BED
Cut-off 0.325 0.733 0.900 1.51 1.89 2.27
Window period 3m (91.5d) 6m (183d) 9m (274d) 12m (366d) 15m (457d) 18m (549d)
False LTS (%) 0/3 (0) 1/12 (8.3) 5/21 (23.8) 5/32 (16) 2/34 (5.9) 3/47 (6.4)
95% CI 0 to 0.53 0.5 to 32 9.6 to 44 6 to 30 1 to 17 2 to 16
Observed false RS (%) 1/124 (0.8) 6/124 (4.8) 8/124 (6.5) NC NC NC
95% CI 0.05 to 3.8 1.9 to 9.6 3 to 12
1Calculated false RS (%) 2.1 4.3 6.4 8.5 10.7 12.8
Tested RSs
Intervention - Control 6 - 10 12 - 27 15-30 23 - 48 33 - 62 42 - 79
Uncorrected effect (%) 43 58 53 55 49 50
95% CI -57 to 84 19 to 80 13 to 77 26 to 75 23 to 67 27 to 66
2Correction
Intervention (%) 28 29 34 30 26 24
Control (%) 24 18 24 20 20 18
Total (%) 25 21 28 23 22 21
Corrected effect (%) 46 63 59 60 53 53
95% CI NC 22 to 88 9 to 86 25 to 80 25 to 73 30 to 70
AI
Cut-off 31.6 80.5 90.0 94.0 96.0 NC
Window period 3m (91.5d) 6m (183d) 9m (274d) 12m (366d) 15m (457d) 18m (549d)
False LTS (%) 0/3 (0) 1/12 (8.3) 3/21 (14) 4/32 (13) 4/34 (12) NC
95% CI 0 to 53 0.5 to 32 4 to 33 4 to 27 3.8 to 25
Observed false RS (%) 0/124 (0) 3/124 (2.4) 15/124 (12) NC NC NC
95% CI 0 to 2.4 0.6 to 6.2 7 to 19
1Calculated false RS (%) 2.9 5.9 8.8 11.8 14.7 NC
Tested RSs NC
Intervention - Control 3 - 11 10 - 19 18-31 26 - 44 33 - 62
Uncorrected effect (%) 74 50 45 44 50 NC
95% CI 19 to 100 -6 to 78 3 to 72 17 to 71 21 to 69
2Correction NC
Intervention (%) 77 47 39 36 36
Control (%) 30 35 32 31 27
Total (%) 40 39 35 33 30
Corrected effect (%) 92 59 50 49 55 NC
95% CI 14 to 100 -14 to 100 -13 to 83 4 to 78 25 to 77

LTS: Long-term seroconverters

RS: Recent seroconverters

m: months

d: days

AI: Avidity index

NC: Not calculable

CI: Confidence interval

1Estimated by linear regression (see Additional file 1)

2Correction for intervention and control = [NHIV+(1-False RS)]/Ntested recent