Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2007 Jan 10;129(1):113–125. doi: 10.1021/ja065627h

Table 3.

A comparison of calculated and experimental covalency values for covalency for the compounds: [Fe(tpp)(ImH)2]+, [Fe(tacn)2]3+, [Fe(tpp)(ImH)2] and [Fe(tacn2)]2+

Total Intensity % Total Metal Character in unoccupied orbitals (based on Intensity) % Total Metal character in unoccupied orbitals (based on DFT) A Comparison of VBCI and DFT values for Differential Orbital Covalency. VBCI(DFT) %
B1 (x2-y2) A1 (z2) B2 (xy) E1 ** (xz, yz) π* (xz, yz)
[Fe(tacn)2]Cl3 43.8 351 333 63(64) 63(64) 99 (93) 99(93)
[Fe(tacn)2]Cl2 37.4 295 284 74(72) 74(72) (93) (93)
A. [Fe(tpp)(ImH)2] Fe(II) π back-bonding only 39.0 309 314 73(66) 73(66) (83) (78) 7(9)
B. [Fe(tpp)(ImH)2] Fe(II) σ,π donation, + π back-bonding 39.0 309 314 65(66) 67(66) (83) (78) 11(9)
A. [Fe(tpp)(ImH)2]Cl Fe(III) σ,π donation only 38.3 303 333 54(66) 68(62) 93 58(71) (2)
B. [Fe(tpp)(ImH)2]Cl Fe(III) σ,π donation, + π back-bonding 38.3 303 333 52(66) 68(62) 93 57(71) 2(2)
**

DFT values for the dxz and dyz orbitals were averaged for comparison to the VBCI model in D4h symmetry. The values for each orbital are given in Table 1.

The % metal character summed over unoccupied orbitals reflects the combined effects of covalency and back-bonding. In a system with no back-bonding this number divided by the number of holes gives the average % metal character in each orbital. For example, [Fe(tacn)2]Cl3, 351/5 =70%, (63*4+99)/5=70