Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 31;33(7):1454–1456. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2245

Table 1.

Estimated difference in mean UAER in mg/24 h§ (95% CI) comparing the middle or the upper third of the dietary n-3 LC-PUFA distribution with the lowest third by treatment randomization and cohort

Exposures Distribution of dietary n-3 LC-PUFAs
Middle vs. lowest thirds* Upper vs. lowest thirds* P
Conventional treatment (n = 727)
Unadjusted model −54.7 (−94.1 to −15.2) −51.6 (−91.4 to −11.8) 0.01
Adjusted model −55.1 (−92.4 to −17.9) −40.2 (−79.2 to −1.3) 0.04
Intensive treatment (n = 709)
Unadjusted model −3.3 (−22.0 to 15.3) −3.9 (−21.9 to 14.0) 0.7
Adjusted model 7.9 (−7.9 to 23.6) −1.1 (−16.8 to 14.5) 0.9
Primary prevention cohort (n = 724)
Unadjusted model −4.4 (−17.2 to 8.3) −3.2 (−15.3 to 9.0) 0.6
Adjusted model −3.4 (−16.3 to 9.4) 2.5 (−10.2 to 15.1) 0.7
Secondary intervention cohort (n = 712)
Unadjusted model −53.8 (−95.4 to −12.3) −49.1 (−91.7 to −6.6) 0.02
Adjusted model −38.2 (−76.5 to −0.2) −45.5 (−86.2 to −4.8) 0.03

Adjusted for age, sex, duration of follow-up, baseline variables (duration of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, creatinine clearance, UAER ‡, serum triglyceride, BMI), A1C at year 1 follow-up, smoking, alcohol intake, exercise, use of dietary supplements, energy intake, and protein intake.

§Difference in mean UAER (mg/24 h) was calculated by modeling the repeated measurements of UAER over the 9-year study period as an outcome in a mixed-effects regression model with random intercepts allowing for the correlation of repeated measures of the same individual.

¶The negative values reflect that the middle and upper third of dietary n-3 LC-PUFAs deteriorated less than the reference group (lowest third).

*Reference group.

P is for a linear trend across thirds of the distribution of dietary n-3 LC-PUFAs. ‡Baseline UAER is defined as the average of UAER between year 0 and year 1.