Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: Acad Radiol. 2010 Jan 13;17(4):520–525. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.11.006

Table 3.

The median values of the goodness of fit (χ2) for the 3 AIFs.

PS LG DE
TP 0.2962 (0.1070 – 0.9060) 0.2470 (0.0795 – 0.7537) 0.2493 (0.0903 – 1.4474)
TN 0.1764 (0.0390 – 1.2353) 0.1609 (0.0391 – 1.2426) 0.1539 (0.0337 – 1.2359)
FP 0.2106 (0.0832 – 0.9487) 0.2216 (0.0562 – 0.9952) 0.1823 (0.0395 – 1.0267)
FN 0.1073 (0.0691 – 0.2736) 0.0750 (0.0529 – 0.1361) 0.0753 (0.0367 – 0.5300)

TP – true positives (enhancing regions with positive biopsy)

TN – true negatives (non-enhancing regions with negative biopsies)

FP – false positives (enhancing regions with negative biopsies)

FN – false negatives (non-enhancing regions with positive biopsies)

PS – patient specific AIF

LG – average of individual measured AIFs fitted to double Gaussian plus exponential function

DE – population average double exponential AIF