Skip to main content
. 2009 Dec 16;31(7):1076–1088. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20919

Table I.

Normalized spatial correlations of three reference masks with three estimated t‐maps for each of 11 subjects by three ICA algorithms

Proposed ICA‐R Infomax
Right task‐related mask and 11 t‐maps Subject 1 0.46 0.46 0.39
Subject 2 0.54 0.54 0.48
Subject 3 0.53 0.52 0.47
Subject 4 0.43 0.43 0.36
Subject 5 0.53 0.23 0.46
Subject 6 0.54 0.50 0.50
Subject 7 0.49 0.49 0.43
Subject 8 0.56 0.56 0.46
Subject 9 0.44 0.27 0.37
Subject 10 0.56 0.56 0.44
Subject 11 0.43 0.43 0.26
Left task‐related mask and 11 t‐maps Subject 1 0.45 0.29 0.36
Subject 2 0.49 0.49 0.36
Subject 3 0.55 0.55 0.49
Subject 4 0.45 0.44 0.39
Subject 5 0.53 0.25 0.46
Subject 6 0.52 0.52 0.46
Subject 7 0.56 0.12 0.48
Subject 8 0.53 0.49 0.41
Subject 9 0.44 0.43 0.37
Subject 10 0.52 0.52 0.42
Subject 11 0.41 0.41 0.30
Default mode mask and 11 t‐maps Subject 1 0.58 0.58 0.35
Subject 2 0.54 0.54 0.23
Subject 3 0.58 0.58 0.30
Subject 4 0.57 0.57 0.37
Subject 5 0.63 0.63 0.51
Subject 6 0.56 0.56 0.30
Subject 7 0.56 0.56 0.41
Subject 8 0.57 0.57 0.31
Subject 9 0.45 0.45 0.25
Subject 10 0.57 0.56 0.26
Subject 11 0.61 0.61 0.41