Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Psychiatry. 2009 Jun 30;15(11):1075–1087. doi: 10.1038/mp.2009.61

Table 3.

Bivariate associations of retrospectively reported childhood adversities with DSM-IV/CIDI bipolar disorder (BP-I/II) with and without frequent mood episodes (FME) in the total sample (n = 9,282)

Twelve-month BPD
Other lifetime BPD Twelve-month FME versus
FME No FME Other 12-month BPD Other LT BPD
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) χ2 χ2

I. Neglect and abuse
 Neglect 3.4* (1.4–8.7) 2.9* (1.1–7.5) 1.2 (0.3–6.0) 0.1 1.2
 Physical abuse 3.2* (1.6–6.4) 10.1* (4.2–24.6) 2.3 (0.8–6.8) 5.4** 0.2
 Sexual abuse 4.4* (1.9–10.1) 6.2* (2.5–15.5) 3.8* (1.3–11.5) 0.5 0.1
 Any 3.6* (1.7–7.8) 6.4* (2.5–16.5) 1.9 (0.8–4.6) 0.9 0.8
II. Loss
 Parent death 0.4 (0.1–1.6) 0.7 (0.2–3.3) 1.4 (0.8–2.5) 0.3 3.0
 Parent divorce 2.4 (1.0–5.4) 1.1 (0.5–2.8) 0.9 (0.3–2.8) 0.9 1.7
 Other major loss 2.6* (1.1–6.4) 3.1* (1.2–7.9) 0.9 (0.2–4.4) 0.1 1.1
 Either 1.7 (0.8–3.4) 1.1 (0.5–2.4) 1.2 (0.5–2.7) 0.5 0.3
III. Parent violence and criminality
 Violence 3.6* (1.5–8.8) 4.8* (2.4–9.3) 2.7* (1.1–7.1) 0.4 0.2
 Criminal behavior 2.3* (1.0–5.6) 4.2* (1.6–10.8) 5.1* (2.2–11.3) 1.5 4.1**
 Either 2.9* (1.3–6.5) 5.2* (2.4–11.2) 3.2* (1.5–6.7) 1.3 0.1
IV. Other adversity
 Family economic adversity 2.5* (1.2–5.4) 3.2* (1.5–6.9) 0.9 (0.2–3.3) 0.7 1.5
 Respondent’s severe physical illness 3.8* (1.4–10.8) 1.0 (0.2–4.6) 0.4 (0.1–3.0) 1.6 4.2**
 Parental mental illness 2.8* (1.4–5.7) 6.5* (2.8–14.8) 2.8* (1.3–6.2) 3.8** 0.0
 Any 2.9* (1.4–6.1) 4.3* (1.9–9.9) 1.8 (0.8–3.9) 1.3 0.7
V. Any childhood adversity
 Any 3.6* (1.7–7.6) 2.7* (1.1–6.8) 3.6* (1.5–8.5) 0.2 0.0
   (n)1 (5,563) (5,550) (5,553)
*

Significant association between the childhood adversity and BPD at the .05 level, two-sided test. The models used to test the significance of these differences controlled for age and sex. A separate model was used for each of the three BPD sub-samples (i.e., 12-month FME, other 12-month BPD, other LT BPD), each compared to respondents without a history of BPD. This is why sample sizes differ somewhat in the three columns of the table.

**

Significant difference between the OR for respondents with 12-month BPD/FME and the OR for other respondents with BPD in the contrast category.

1

Logistic regression models were used to generate the results in this table. A separate model was used for each of the three BPD sub-samples (i.e., 12-month FME, other 12-month BPD, other LT BPD), each compared to respondents without a history of BPD. This is why sample sizes differ somewhat in the three columns of the table. Childhood adversities were assessed in Part II, which is why the sample sizes are smaller than in Table 1.