Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2009 Jun 22;104(10):1743–1756. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02617.x

Table 2.

Partitioning the mediated paths: Total effects, direct effects, and indirect effects.

Primary model: Depression symptoms predict smoking
95% CIb
Effect Estimate S.E.a Estimate/S.E. p-value Low High
Depression symptoms level to peer smoking level to smoking level
Total effect .26 .08 3.13 .002 .10 .42
Total indirect effectc .33 .07 5.09 <.0001 .21 .46
Specific indirect effectd .33 .07 5.09 <.0001 .21 .46
Direct effect -.07 .08 -.95 .34 -.22 .08
Depression symptoms level to peer smoking level to smoking trend
Total effect .13 .05 2.48 .01 .03 .23
Total indirect effect -.03 .05 -.50 .62 -.13 .08
Specific indirect effect .08 .02 3.35 .001 .03 .13
Direct effect .16 .06 2.44 .02 .03 .28
Depression symptoms trend to peer smoking trend to smoking trend
Total effect .29 .22 1.29 .20 -.15 .72
Total indirect effect .75 .24 3.11 .002 .28 1.23
Specific indirect effect .75 .24 3.11 .002 .28 1.23
Direct Effect -.47 .26 -1.76 .08 -.98 .05
Alternative model: Smoking predicts depression symptoms
95% CI
Effect Estimate S.E. Estimate/S.E. p-value Low High
Smoking level to peer smoking level to depression symptoms level
Total effect .09 .03 3.08 .002 .03 .14
Total indirect .15 .04 4.08 <.0001 .08 .23
Specific indirect effect .15 .04 4.08 <.0001 .08 .23
Direct effect -.07 .05 -1.37 .17 -.16 .03
Smoking level to peer smoking trend to depression symptoms trend
Total effect -.04 .02 -1.73 .08 -.08 .01
Total indirect effect -.10 .04 -2.97 .003 -.17 -.04
Specific indirect effect -.06 .02 -2.76 .01 -.11 -.02
Direct effect .07 .04 1.71 .09 -.01 .15
Smoking trend to peer smoking trend to depression symptoms trend
Total effect .04 .03 1.17 .24 -.02 .10
Total indirect effect .18 .06 2.97 .003 .06 .30
Specific indirect effect .18 .06 2.97 .003 .06 .30
Direct effect -.15 .07 -2.14 .03 -.28 -.01

Note: Only significant indirect effects are reported

a

Delta Method Standard Errors

b

95% confidence intervals containing zero are not significant

c

total indirect effect represents the total of all indirect effects, including the specific indirect effect presented

d

the specific indirect effect is the significant indirect effect. Non-significant indirect effects are not presented in this table for parsimony