Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Aug 11;73(10):1423–1429. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.07.009

Table 2.

Parent and Child assessment of Quality of Life in children using Cochlear Implants

Children
with CI
(n = 50)
Parents of
Children with CI
(n = 45)
Children
with NH
(n = 25)

Variable M SD M SD M SD
Physical Well-
being
71.5 27.2 77.2 16.4 74.0 19.7
Emotional Well-
being
85.0 19.6 82.8 13.5 76.0 18.4
Self-esteem 85.0 18.2 74.9 12.7 72.0 25.3
Family 87.5 15.4 73.9 14.6 90.0 14.4
Friends 84.0 15.8 75.1 14.3 90.0 12.5
Everyday
functioning/
school
84.0 25.6 81.4 16.0 83.0 28.6
General - - 78.6 10.5 - -

Total 82.8 9.7 78.1 9.6 80.8 10.4
a

Multi-dimensional quality of life (QoL) was assessed via the Kiddy KINDLR 39. Children completed 12 items evenly distributed among 6 subscales (e.g. physical well-being, emotional well-being, self-esteem, family, friends, and everyday functioning/ school). Parents completed 4 items per subscale plus an additional 22 questions as part of a General subscale that provided information about the child’s temperament and behavior patterns. The subscales of Kiddy KINDLR sum to an overall index score. Each score is transformed to a 100 point scale, with 0 representing minimal quality of life and 100 representing maximal quality of life. Statistical analysis of parent versus child assessment of quality life only could be conducted for overall quality of life due to the low number of items completed by the children in individual subscales. Thus, inclusion of individual subscales for children are included solely to demonstrate trends in the data.