Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Jun;24(2):292–299. doi: 10.1037/a0018126

Table 2.

Rates of Family History Reports of Gambling Involvement of Cotwin and Spouse by Gender of Target, and Prevalences of Twin Self-Reports for Comparison

Gender of Target
Gambling Behavior Males (%) Females (%) Odds Ratioc 95% CI p-value
Ever Gambled
 Cotwin (N = 4,604) 93.96 92.62 1.24 (0.98 – 1.57) 0.07
 Spouse (N = 3,733) 90.82 86.95 1.33 (1.21 – 1.83) < .001
 Twina (N = 4,758) 98.38 97.72 1.41 (0.92 – 2.16) 0.11
Gambled Monthly
 Cotwin (N = 4,301) 37.79 30.03 1.42 (1.25 – 1.61) < .001
 Spouse (N = 3,710) 35.47 24.92 1.40 (1.43 – 1.91) < .001
 Twina (N = 4,764) 55.87 47.30 1.41 (1.26 – 1.58) < .001
Gambled Weekly
 Cotwin (N = 4,254) 25.23 19.31 1.41 (1.22 – 1.63) < .001
 Spouse (N = 3,702) 24.64 15.47 1.44 (1.51 – 2.12) < .001
 Twina (N = 4,764) 39.08 33.66 1.26 (1.12 – 1.42) < .001
Gambling Problem
 Cotwin (N = 4,567) 3.65 1.71 2.18 (1.49 – 3.19) < .001
 Spouse (N = 3,722) 2.80 1.01 1.65 (1.67 – 5.64) < .001
 Twina,b (N = 4,764) 18.16 8.25 2.47 (2.07 – 2.95) < .001
a

Note: Based on self-report.

b

Gambling problem defined as one or more lifetime DSM-IV PG symptoms.

c

Odds ratios were computed with females as the reference group (i.e., female = 0, male = 1).