Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int Psychogeriatr. 2010 Jan 28;22(5):785–794. doi: 10.1017/S1041610209991657

Table 1.

Associations of OME/SIT test variables with Clinical Dementia Rating (N=1921):

Unadjusted
Adjusted
Test OR 95% CI for OR P Value OR 95% CI for OR P Value
OME 3 Trial Recall ≤ 17 4.60 3.49 6.05 <0.001 3.72 1.78 7.80 < 0.001
SIT Bag B Recall ≤ 4 3.10 2.42 3.96 <0.001 2.55 1.97 3.29 <0.001
SIT Bag A Short Delay Recall ≤ 2 3.08 2.35 4.03 <0.001 2.71 2.05 3.57 <0.001
SIT Bag A + Bag B Recalls ≤ 7 3.71 2.85 4.83 <0.001 3.10 2.36 4.08 <0.001
SIT Bag A Delayed Recall ≤ 4 3.97 3.02 5.22 <0.001 3.33 2.51 4.40 <0.001
Proactive Interference Ratio ≤ 0.572 2.06 1.53 2.79 <0.001 4.79 2.26 10.16 <0.001
Retroactive Interference Ratio ≤ 0.286 2.54 1.89 3.40 <0.001 2.29 1.69 3.09 <0.001
Total Interference Ratio ≤ 1.028 2.34 1.73 3.17 <0.001 0.95 0.48 1.87 0.880
Intrusions ≥ 3 2.64 2.00 3.48 <0.001 2.25 1.69 2.99 <0.001

Note.

Multiple logistic regression models with CDR=0.5 as outcome and OME/SIT variable as predictor, adjusted for age, education, gender, and race.

Cutoffs based on 10th percentile of total distribution of the OME/SIT variables.

Non-white race, older age, and male gender are significantly associated with 0.5 CDR global score.

Significant interactions are Fuld OME 3 trials × Age, PIR × Age, and TIR × Education.