Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 16;73(8):1612–1631. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.03.018

Table 8.

Promoter analysis for the mouse genes encoding Nrf2-regulated proteins.

String search (dna-pattern)
Matrix analysis (patser)
Highest scoring ARE
SwissProt acc. no. Protein name Fold-change Number of consensus sequences (RTGABNNNGCA) Number of matching sequences Highest score Mean score SD Location from to Sequence
P02762 Major urinary protein 6 0.35 0 14 4.89 2.03 1.07 −1935 −1923 ttccCTGTCACTAAGCAtgtt
P10649 Glutathione S-transferase Mu 1 0.41 4 15 4.40 2.42 1.09 −56 −44 gtggGCAGGACAAAACAgcgg
P19157 Glutathione S-transferase P 1 0.54 0 13 4.02 2.11 0.98 −68 −56 aacgTGTTGAGTCAGCAtccg
Q91WG8 Bifunctional UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase/N-acetylmannosamine kinase 0.55 0 12 5.95 2.50 1.70 −387 −375 gcagGGGTGGCAAAGCTtaaa
P17717 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2B5 0.55 1 13 5.59 2.40 1.23 −398 −386 cagtCCATGACTGAGTTtgaa
Q99P30 Peroxisomal coenzyme A diphosphatase NUDT7 1.41 1 8 4.68 2.49 1.14 −848 −836 caagGCATTACACAGCCcagg
Q8JZR0 Long-chain-fatty-acid-CoA ligase 5 1.57 1 10 7.66 2.56 1.90 −1234 −1222 cttaGAATGACCCAGCCcttg
Q91V92 ATP-citrate synthase 1.75 1 9 10.02 3.26 2.58 −1899 −1887 agaaAAATGACTAAGCAggta
Q8VCH0 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase B, peroxisomal 2.21 2 15 5.84 2.55 1.44 −137 −125 tgggGGAAGACTCAGGAagag
Q05816 Fatty acid-binding protein, epidermal 2.81 0 15 4.37 2.59 0.86 −1728 −1716 agtgGGATGTCGCAGCTcagg
Mean values for all Nrf2-regulated proteins 1.26 1.25 13.69 5.62 2.50 1.33
Mean values for all down-regulated Nrf2-dependent proteins 0.57 1.00 15.40 5.20 2.54 1.23
Mean values for all up-regulated Nrf2-dependent proteins 1.57 1.36 12.91 5.81 2.49 1.37
Mean values for all proteins identified 1.21 13.20 6.48 2.03 1.62

Sequences of the genes of Nrf2-regulated proteins were obtained from the ENSMBL mouse genome database and interrogated for ARE and ARE/like consensus sequences using the RSAT analysis software (http://rsat.ulb.ac.be/rsat/). Both string-based (dna-pattern) and matrix-based (patser) pattern searching strategies were adopted (see text for details). For the dna-pattern analysis, returned sequences were rated against the ‘perfect’ consensus sequence RTGABNNNGCA. For the patser analysis, the number of sequences matching the position specific scoring matrix with a score > 1 are given, along with the highest score attained. For comparison, equivalent data from the entire set of identified proteins is included at the foot of the table.