Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pathophysiology. 2009 Dec 24;17(4):229–251. doi: 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.11.003

Table 2.

Incidence of LVI and BVI in breast cancer and the impact on patient survival

# of
Study
# of
Patients
% Invasiona
Comments P valuec Reference
LVIb BVIb
1 1,408 34.2 4.2 LVI and BVI were both indicators of poor
survival
P=0.001 [2]
1 1,408 34.2 4.2 Multivariate analysis showed that LVI is a
strong prognostic indicator of significantly
increased risk of death in both LNb positive and
negative patients whereas BVI has no prognostic
value
P=0.001 [2]
2 1,258 27.6 NDd LVI was a highly significant independent
predictor of disease outcome
P<0.0001 [49]
3 374 28.0 ND LVI presented as an independent prognostic
parameter for DFSb as well as OSb
P=0.001 [50]
4 303 27.0 ND Multivariate analysis revealed that LVI was the
only significant predictor of distal recurrence.
LVI was significantly associated with shorter
overall survival
P=0.009 {3497}
5 177 96.4 3.5 LVI was strongly associated with LN metastasis,
distant metastasis, decreased DFS and OS
P<0.001 [36]
6 123 28.5 15.4 LVI but not BVI positively correlated with tumor
cell Ki67 score and other markers associated
with poor prognosis
Not
assessede
[42]
7 95 69.5 37.9 When LVI and BVI were both present, 80% of
the invaded vessels were of lymphatic origin
Not
assessed
[44]
a

% Invasion is presented as a fraction of cases in which tumor cells were immunohistochemically in the lumen of lymphatic or blood vessels.

b

Abbreviations: LN, lymph node; LVI, lymphatic vascular invasion; BVI, blood vascular invasion; DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival.

c

P values for association of LVI disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).

d

ND, not determined.

e

Association of LVI or BVI with patient survival was not assessed in this study.