Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Obes Rev. 2011 Jan;12(1):50–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00708.x

Table 2.

Sources of Heterogeneity in Cost of Obesity Studies

Aggregated vs stratified (i.e., multiple) cost estimates
 All ages (n = 12) vs age-specific (n= 21)
 Both genders (n = 22) vs gender-specific (n = 11)
 All obesity (n = 19) vs obesity class-specific (n = 11)*
Standard (n = 21) vs nonstandard (n = 12) BMI levels used to define overweight/obesity
Estimates based on costs (n = 9) vs expenditures (n = 11) vs charges (n = 6) versus mixed reporting (n = 7)
National cost estimates (n = 7) vs per-person estimates (n = 26)
Estimates made for 1 year (n = 20) vs estimates made for multiple years (n = 13)
Year in which cost is expressed
Studies with national samples (n = 11) vs those with less representative samples (n = 13) vs attributable risk design (n = 4) vs decision modeling (n = 5)
Estimates for all adults (n = 12) vs estimates restricted to specific age groups (n = 21)
All health care costs (n = 24) vs costs for putatively obesity-related conditions only (n = 9)
Adjusted (n = 24) or unadjusted (n = 9) for characteristics of study participants
*

Among studies reporting costs for obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2)