Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Psychiatry. 2009 Mar 10;15(8):816–822. doi: 10.1038/mp.2009.26

Table 2.

Neuroimaging differences by AGTR1 and AGTR2 genotypes

AGTR1 A/A (N = 135) C allele carrier (N = 96) df Test statistic p value
WML, BL 5.0 (7.7) 6.9 (11.6) 153 1.40 0.1638
WML, Y2 6.0 (9.5) 9.2 (13.8) 157 1.96 0.0523
WML, change 0.9 (2.3) 2.2 (3.9) 142 2.89 0.0044

AGTR2: MEN C allele (N = 33) A allele (N = 43) df Test statistic p value

WML, BL 5.0 (3.7) 7.1 (13.0) 50.8 1.00 0.3201
WML, Y2 5.6 (4.8) 9.0 (16.6) 50.9 1.28 0.2078
WML, change 0.6 (2.3) 1.9 (4.1) 68.9 1.76 0.0823

AGTR2: WOMEN C/C (N=47) A/C (N=61) A/A (N=47) df Test statistic p value

WML, BL 3.7 (1.7) 6.3 (12.3) 6.8 (9.1) 2,154 1.58 0.2085
WML, Y2 5.2 (4.1) 7.6 (13.5) 8.5 (11.8) 2,154 1.14 0.3238
WML, change 1.6 (2.9) 1.4 (2.8) 1.6 (3.3) 2,154 0.13 0.8821

Lesion volumes presented in milliliters as mean (SD) and analyzed used the Satterthwaite t-test due unequal variances for the AGTR1 analyses and the AGTR2 analyses in men. ANCOVA was used for AGTR2 analyses in women as genotype was 3-tiered.