Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 18;172(1):94–106. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq121

Table 3.

Odds Ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals for the Association Between Circulating 25(OH)D and Risk of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Overall and by Season or Sex Within the Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers

Circulating 25(OH)D, nmol/L
Ptrend
<25
25–<37.5
37.5–<50
50–<75a
75–<100
≥100
No. of Cases No. of Controls OR 95% CI No. of Cases No. of Controls OR 95% CI No. of Cases No. of Controls OR 95% CI No. of Cases No. of Controls OR No. of Cases No. of Controls OR 95% CI No. of Cases No. of Controls OR 95% CI
All subjectsb 241 252 248 239 224 223 249 252 83 77 20 23
    Crude 0.96 0.72, 1.28 1.04 0.80, 1.37 1.02 0.79, 1.33 1.0 1.09 0.76, 1.57 0.88 0.45, 1.70 0.79
    Multivariate adjusted 0.90 0.65, 1.24 1.03 0.76, 1.39 0.92 0.69, 1.23 1.0 1.17 0.79, 1.75 0.81 0.39, 1.69 0.54
All subjects, winterc 183 202 161 136 105 110 83 80 24 25 4 3
    Crude 0.89 0.60, 1.32 1.16 0.78, 1.74 0.93 0.62, 1.42 1.0 0.96 0.50, 1.84 1.20 0.24, 5.94 0.71
    Multivariate adjusted 0.87 0.57, 1.31 1.13 0.74, 1.72 0.89 0.58, 1.38 1.0 0.82 0.41, 1.65 0.97 0.17, 5.43 0.81
All subjects, summerc 58 50 87 103 119 113 166 172 59 52 16 20
    Crude 1.18 0.75, 1.87 0.86 0.60, 1.25 1.07 0.76, 1.51 1.0 1.17 0.76, 1.81 0.83 0.41, 1.69 1.00
    Multivariate adjusted 0.90 0.55, 1.46 0.79 0.53, 1.17 0.98 0.68, 1.40 1.0 1.30 0.82, 2.06 0.83 0.40, 1.74 0.23
Menb 177 190 176 152 149 155 190 193 63 65 20 21
    Crude 0.95 0.68, 1.33 1.19 0.86, 1.63 0.99 0.72, 1.34 1.0 0.97 0.64, 1.47 0.95 0.48, 1.89 0.85
    Multivariate adjusted 0.89 0.61, 1.31 1.23 0.85, 1.76 0.87 0.62, 1.24 1.0 1.03 0.65, 1.64 0.88 0.41, 1.89 0.97
Womenb 64 62 72 87 75 68 59 59 20 12 0 2
    Crude 0.98 0.55, 1.73 0.79 0.46, 1.34 1.10 0.66, 1.83 1.0 1.83 0.81, 4.14 0.39
    Multivariate adjusted 0.88 0.47, 1.65 0.78 0.44, 1.38 0.96 0.56, 1.67 1.0 1.79 0.74, 4.33 0.34

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; OR, odds ratio.

a

Reference category.

b

Conditional logistic regression models were matched on cohort, race, sex, and date of blood draw without or with further adjustment for alcohol drinking, smoking, education, and history of gastric surgery.

c

Unconditional logistic regression models were adjusted for the matching factors cohort, race, sex, and date of blood draw without or with further adjustment for alcohol drinking, smoking, education, and history of gastric surgery.