Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Aquat Toxicol. 2010 Mar 11;98(4):311–321. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.03.003

Table 2.

Percentage of sequence identity between pairs of nucleotide (Nucl), or deduced amino acid (AA) sequences), or between substrate recognition site (SRS) regions, as determined after optimal pair-wise alignment with ClustalW in BioEdit (Hall, 1999). Comparisons were made between the cloned rainbow trout CYP1B1 CYP1C1 CYP1C2, and CYP1C3 (coding sequence), and between the cloned sequences, and orthologous sequences in zebrafish and human. Accession numbers are available in the supplemental information. Bold underlined numbers indicate the highest identities observed.

Rainbow trout
CYP1B1 CYP1C1 CYP1C2 CYP1C3
Nucl AA SRS Nucl AA SRS Nucl AA SRS Nucl AA SRS
Rainbow trout CYP1C1 56 47 56
CYP1C2 55 48 57 85 84 82
CYP1C3 56 48 57 94 93 89 83 82 82

Zebrafish CYP1B1 66 64 79 54 48 58 56 50 58 55 49 56
CYP1C1 55 48 58 75 82 85 73 79 81 75 82 86
CYP1C2 55 47 56 70 73 74 72 79 86 70 72 73

Human CYP1B1 57 50 58 55 48 57 59 47 55 55 47 55