Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: DNA Repair (Amst). 2010 May 14;9(7):728–736. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.03.016

Table 4.

Comparison among Hprt mutation spectra in EM-C11 and CHO-9 cell lines

EM-C11
CHO-9a
Type of Hprt mutations Spontaneous Me-lex
induced Spontaneous Me-lex induced
n° (%) n° (%)
n° (%) n° (%)
Base pair changes 9 (31%) 7
(15%) 16 (43%) 10 (23%)
  AT-targeted 3 (10%) 7
(15%) 12 (32%) 7 (16%)
AT>TA 1 2
  1   2
AT>GC 2 2
  9   4
AT > CG 0 3
  2   2
  GC-targeted 6 (21%) 0
  4 (11%)   3 (7%)
GC > AT 0 0
  0   1
GC > CG 0 0
  1   0
GC > TA 6 0
  3   2
Splice mutationsb 3 (10%) 9
(19%)c   1 (3%)   1(2%)c
Frame shifts 2 (7%) 2
(4.3%) 0 3 (7%)
Genomic deletions 11 (38%)d 11
(24%) 3 (8%)d 21 (48%)
  Exon deletions 6 (21%) 6
(13%) 3 9 (21%)
  Complete Hprt deletions 5 (17%) 5
(11%) 0 12 (27%)
Mutations in regulatory regions 3 (10.5%)e 16
(35%)e   12 (32%)   8 (18%)
Other 1 (3.5%) 1
(2%)   5 (14%)   1 (2%)
Total n° of mutations 29 (100%) 46
(100%)   37 (100%)   44 (100%)
a

From Russo et al., 2009 and data unpublished

b

This category includes splice mutants for which the mutation at splice junction was found

c

p=0.0153 (Fisher’s exact test)

d

p=0.0054 (Fisher’s exact test)

e

p=0.0277 (Fisher’s exact test)