Table 3.
Simulation results for the design based on the elicited utilities A given in Table 2.
d1 |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scenario | d2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | R | % none | |
1 | 3 | utrue(d) | 57.3 | 56.9 | 60.4 | 64.2 | 0.71 | 0 |
% Sel, # Pats. | 1, 0.7 | 2, 0.7 | 6, 2.7 | 14, 5.1 | ||||
2 | utrue(d) | 60.5 | 60.1 | 63.6 | 67.4 | |||
% Sel, # Pats. | 4, 1.4 | 4, 6.9 | 14, 8.9 | 29, 12.0 | ||||
1 | utrue(d) | 54.6 | 54.2 | 57.8 | 61.7 | |||
% Sel, # Pats. | 1, 0.3 | 0, 0.3 | 2, 1.0 | 22, 8.0 | ||||
2 | 3 | utrue(d) | 47.2 | 46.2 | 44.2 | 42.2 | 0.81 | 1 |
% Sel, # Pats. | 2, 0.8 | 1, 0.8 | 2, 0.9 | 1, 0.5 | ||||
2 | utrue(d) | 54.6 | 65.8 | 61.8 | 43.4 | |||
% Sel, # Pats. | 8, 2.7 | 44, 21.9 | 34, 15.2 | 1, 1.6 | ||||
1 | utrue(d) | 44.6 | 44.9 | 45.1 | 39.1 | |||
% Sel, # Pats. | 3, 1.0 | 0, 0.5 | 2, 1.1 | 1, 0.9 | ||||
3 | 3 | utrue(d) | 48.6 | 53.1 | 59.6 | 64.9 | 0.85 | 0 |
% Sel, # Pats. | 1, 0.7 | 2, 0.7 | 9, 3.2 | 23, 9.4 | ||||
2 | utrue(d) | 43.9 | 50.8 | 55.2 | 63.5 | |||
% Sel, # Pats. | 0, 0.2 | 1, 4.1 | 4, 4.9 | 35, 14.1 | ||||
1 | utrue(d) | 41.4 | 48.9 | 53.4 | 58.8 | |||
% Sel, # Pats. | 0, 0.1 | 0, 0.1 | 1, 0.8 | 25, 9.8 | ||||
4 | 3 | utrue(d) | 61.2 | 51.0 | 38.0 | 26.0 | 0.78 | 0 |
% Sel, # Pats. | 12, 3.5 | 2, 1.0 | 1, 1.7 | 1, 3.0 | ||||
2 | utrue(d) | 65.4 | 53.6 | 45.3 | 37.3 | |||
% Sel, # Pats. | 19, 5.6 | 2, 5.8 | 4, 6.7 | 4, 5.7 | ||||
1 | utrue(d) | 73.9 | 61.9 | 55.2 | 44.9 | |||
% Sel, # Pats. | 44, 9.8 | 0, 0.3 | 1, 0.8 | 9, 4.1 | ||||
5 | 3 | utrue(d) | 44.6 | 44.2 | 46.8 | 49.6 | 0.67 | 85 |
% Sel, # Pats. | 1, 1.6 | 1, 1.3 | 3, 2.4 | 3, 4.2 | ||||
2 | utrue(d) | 45.6 | 45.0 | 47.7 | 50.0 | |||
% Sel, # Pats. | 0, 0.5 | 1, 3.8 | 1, 2.0 | 1, 0.8 | ||||
1 | utrue(d) | 39.7 | 39.0 | 41.7 | 44.0 | |||
% Sel, # Pats. | 0, 0.7 | 0, 0.7 | 1, 2.8 | 3, 4.7 |