Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 29.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2009 Aug 10;66(2):532–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01302.x

Table 3.

Simulation results for the design based on the elicited utilities A given in Table 2.

d1
Scenario d2 1 2 3 4 R % none

1 3 utrue(d) 57.3 56.9 60.4 64.2 0.71 0
% Sel, # Pats. 1, 0.7 2, 0.7 6, 2.7 14, 5.1
2 utrue(d) 60.5 60.1 63.6 67.4
% Sel, # Pats. 4, 1.4 4, 6.9 14, 8.9 29, 12.0
1 utrue(d) 54.6 54.2 57.8 61.7
% Sel, # Pats. 1, 0.3 0, 0.3 2, 1.0 22, 8.0
2 3 utrue(d) 47.2 46.2 44.2 42.2 0.81 1
% Sel, # Pats. 2, 0.8 1, 0.8 2, 0.9 1, 0.5
2 utrue(d) 54.6 65.8 61.8 43.4
% Sel, # Pats. 8, 2.7 44, 21.9 34, 15.2 1, 1.6
1 utrue(d) 44.6 44.9 45.1 39.1
% Sel, # Pats. 3, 1.0 0, 0.5 2, 1.1 1, 0.9
3 3 utrue(d) 48.6 53.1 59.6 64.9 0.85 0
% Sel, # Pats. 1, 0.7 2, 0.7 9, 3.2 23, 9.4
2 utrue(d) 43.9 50.8 55.2 63.5
% Sel, # Pats. 0, 0.2 1, 4.1 4, 4.9 35, 14.1
1 utrue(d) 41.4 48.9 53.4 58.8
% Sel, # Pats. 0, 0.1 0, 0.1 1, 0.8 25, 9.8
4 3 utrue(d) 61.2 51.0 38.0 26.0 0.78 0
% Sel, # Pats. 12, 3.5 2, 1.0 1, 1.7 1, 3.0
2 utrue(d) 65.4 53.6 45.3 37.3
% Sel, # Pats. 19, 5.6 2, 5.8 4, 6.7 4, 5.7
1 utrue(d) 73.9 61.9 55.2 44.9
% Sel, # Pats. 44, 9.8 0, 0.3 1, 0.8 9, 4.1
5 3 utrue(d) 44.6 44.2 46.8 49.6 0.67 85
% Sel, # Pats. 1, 1.6 1, 1.3 3, 2.4 3, 4.2
2 utrue(d) 45.6 45.0 47.7 50.0
% Sel, # Pats. 0, 0.5 1, 3.8 1, 2.0 1, 0.8
1 utrue(d) 39.7 39.0 41.7 44.0
% Sel, # Pats. 0, 0.7 0, 0.7 1, 2.8 3, 4.7