Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neuropsychol. 2010 Mar 30;24(5):779–792. doi: 10.1080/13854041003627795

Table 6.

Validation of regression formulas in entire sample

Measure Predicted by Observed One-Year Predicted One-Year Difference t r 90% CI % -/+
Same Test
HVLT-R Total HVLT-R Total 24.5 (6.1) 24.6 (4.0) -0.1 (4.7) -0.2 0.64 5.4 15/11
HVLT-R DR HVLT-R DR 7.5 (3.6) 7.5 (2.5) 0.0 (2.5) 0.1 0.70 3.2 13/6
List Learning List Learning 26.0 (6.0) 25.7 (4.1) 0.3 (4.4) 0.6 0.67 5.5 7/7
List Recall List Recall 5.1 (2.6) 5.2 (1.8) -0.1 (1.9) -0.6 0.70 2.2 12/7
Story Memory Story Memory 16.7 (4.2) 16.6 (2.8) 0.1 (3.2) 0.4 0.66 4.2 8/8
Story Recall Story Recall 8.7 (2.6) 8.3 (1.6) 0.4 (2.1) 2.2* 0.62 1.9 12/22
Different Test
HVLT-R Total List Learning 24.5 (6.1) 24.4 (3.4) 0.1 (5.0) 0.3 0.57 5.4 13/11
HVLT-R Total Story Memory 24.5 (6.1) 24.2 (3.5) 0.3 (5.0) 0.6 0.57 5.4 15/11
HVLT-R DR List Recall 7.5 (3.6) 7.6 (2.3) -0.1 (2.7) -0.2 0.65 3.2 13/7
HVLT-R DR Story Recall 7.5 (3.6) 7.4 (2.3) 0.1 (2.8) 0.4 0.63 3.2 13/11
List Learning HVLT-R Total 26.0 (6.0) 25.8 (4.1) 0.2 (4.3) 0.4 0.69 5.5 9/9
List Learning Story Memory 26.0 (6.0) 25.7 (3.7) 0.2 (4.7) 0.5 0.62 5.5 9/10
List Recall HVLT-R DR 5.1 (2.6) 5.1 (1.7) -0.1 (1.9) -0.3 0.67 2.2 11/7
List Recall Story Recall 5.1 (2.6) 5.1 (1.7) 0.0 (2.0) -0.3 0.64 2.2 13/12
Story Memory HVLT-R Total 16.7 (4.2) 16.4 (4.2) 0.3 (3.4) 1.0 0.59 4.2 12/14
Story Memory List Learning 16.7 (4.2) 16.5 (2.4) 0.2 (3.5) 0.5 0.56 4.2 10/11
Story Recall HVLT-R DR 8.7 (2.6) 9.1 (1.5) -0.4 (2.1) -2.3* 0.59 1.9 25/10
Story Recall List Recall 8.7 (2.6) 8.4 (1.4) 0.3 (2.2) 1.4 0.53 1.9 18/21
Same Test
TMT-A TMT-A 44.0 (19.2) 43.6 (11.8) 0.4 (15.2) 0.3 0.62 16.3 4/7
TMT-B TMT-B 112.3 (64.4) 112.6 (46.3) -0.3 (44.9) -0.1 0.72 47.9 6/6
SDMT SDMT 40.1 (11.7) 40.0 (8.4) 0.1 (8.1) 0.2 0.72 8.1 8/9
Coding Coding 39.4 (11.1) 39.2 (9.2) 0.2 (6.3) 0.4 0.82 6.8 8/9
Different Test
TMT-A TMT-B 44.0 (19.2) 44.7 (11.4) -0.6 (15.7) -0.5 0.58 16.3 6/9
TMT-A SDMT 44.0 (19.2) 44.2 (11.4) -0.2 (15.5) -0.1 0.59 16.3 7/8
TMT-A Coding 44.0 (19.2) 44.0 (10.8) 0.0 (15.9) 0.0 0.56 16.3 7/6
TMT-B TMT-A 112.3 (64.4) 111.9 (40.1) 0.3 (50.4) 0.1 0.62 47.9 10/8
TMT-B SDMT 112.3 (64.4) 112.5 (41.6) -0.2 (49.2) 0.0 0.65 47.9 9/9
TMT-B Coding 112.3 (64.4) 112.3 (40.6) 0.0 (50.0) 0.0 0.63 47.9 8/9
SDMT TMT-A 40.1 (11.7) 40.0 (6.4) 0.1 (9.8) 0.1 0.55 8.1 5/15
SDMT TMT-B 40.1 (11.7) 40.4 (6.7) -0.3 (9.5) -0.3 0.58 8.1 14/13
SDMT Coding 40.1 (11.7) 40.2 (8.3) 0.0 (8.3) 0.0 0.71 8.1 10/6
Coding TMT-A 39.4 (11.1) 39.0 (7.4) 0.4 (8.3) 0.6 0.66 6.8 19/22
Coding TMT-B 39.4 (11.1) 38.8 (7.8) 0.6 (8.0) 0.8 0.69 6.8 17/11
Coding SDMT 39.4 (11.1) 39.7 (8.8) -0.3 (6.8) -0.5 0.79 6.8 15/11
Same Test
COWAT COWAT 39.7 (12.4) 40.0 (8.9) -0.2 (8.8) -0.3 0.71 9.9 9/10
Animals Animals 18.0 (6.0) 18.1 (3.0) 0.0 (5.2) 0.1 0.51 6.0 8/7
Picture Naming Picture Naming 9.6 (0.7) 9.3 (0.4) 0.4 (0.6) 7.4* 0.55 0.7 5/21
Semantic Fluency Semantic Fluency 19.1 (4.9) 19.2 (3.4) -0.1 (3.5) -0.3 0.69 4.4 10/13
Different Test
COWAT Animals 39.7 (12.4) 39.6 (3.7) 0.0 (12.0) 0.0 0.30 9.9 19/18
COWAT Picture Naming 39.7 (12.4) 39.7 (2.6) 0.0 (12.1) 0.0 0.21 9.9 21/19
COWAT Semantic Fluency 39.7 (12.4) 39.7 (4.9) 0.0 (11.4) 0.0 0.40 9.9 19/19
Animals COWAT 18.0 (6.0) 18.0 (2.6) 0.1 (5.4) 0.1 0.44 6.0 12/10
Animals Picture Naming 18.0 (6.0) 17.9 (1.6) 0.1 (5.7) 0.3 0.27 6.0 12/12
Animals Semantic Fluency 18.0 (6.0) 17.9 (2.3) 0.1 (5.5) 0.3 0.38 6.0 12/8
Picture Naming COWAT 9.6 (0.7) 9.8 (0.2) -0.1 (0.6) -2.2* 0.25 0.7 19/0
Picture Naming Animals 9.6 (0.7) 9.7 (0.2) -0.1 (0.6) -1.9 0.25 0.7 19/0
Picture Naming Semantic Fluency 9.6 (0.7) 9.8 (0.2) -0.1 (0.6) -2.4* 0.25 0.7 19/0
Semantic Fluency COWAT 19.1 (4.9) 19.2 (2.6) 0.0 (4.2) -0.1 0.52 4.4 16/15
Semantic Fluency Animals 19.1 (4.9) 18.9 (2.9) 0.2 (4.0) 0.6 0.59 4.4 11/13
Semantic Fluency Picture Naming 19.1 (4.9) 18.9 (2.2) 0.3 (4.4) 0.7 0.44 4.4 15/20

Note. Observed one-year score is actual score obtained at one-year follow-up visit. Predicted one-year score is the predicted score expected at one-year follow-up visit based on equations in Tables 3 - 5. Difference is Observed minus Predicted one-year scores. t = t-value in the dependent t-test comparing Observed and Predicted one-year scores. r = Pearson correlation between Observed and Predicted one-year scores. 90% CI = 90% confidence interval of the one-year scores. %-/+ = % of participants that fall below the confidence interval and % of participants that fall above the confidence interval.