Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul;12(4):441–452. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090214

Table 4.

Conventional Cytogenetics and D-FISH Results Using a Homebrew MLL/ELL Probe for 18 Patients with t (11;19) (q23;p13.1)

Conventional cytogenetic analysis
FISH analysis*
Patient no. Age (years) Karyotype Abnormal nuclei (%) Interphase signal pattern
66 7 W 47,XY,+8,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [20] 82.6 1R1G2F
67 5 M 46,XY,t (2;19;11) (p11.2;p13.1;q23) [2] 2.8 2R2G1F
68 13 46,XX,t (2;12) (p11.2;q13),add(7) (p15),t (11;19) (q23;p13.1),add(17) (q25) [20] 91.2 1R1G2F
69 20 46,XX,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [18]/46,XX[12] 71.4 1R1G2F
70 30 46,XX,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [7]/46,idem,add(13) (p12) [13] 56.4 1R1G2F
71 34 47,XX,+8,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1),del(13) (q12q14) [20] 88.8 1R1G2F
72 44 46,XY,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1),−14,t (15;21) (q22;q22) [1]/46,XY[29] 12.8 1R1G2F
73 49 46,XX,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [19]/46,XX[1] 81.8 1R1G2F
74 51 46,XX,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [20] 96.8 1R1G2F
75 52 46,XX,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [21] 81.6 1R1G2F
76 55 46,XX,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [20] 80.6 1R1G2F
77 55 46,XX,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [12]/46,XX[10] 50.4 1R1G2F
78 58 45-48,XY,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1),+i(13) (q10) [cp25]/46,XY,i(17) (q10) [2]/ 46,XY[13] 96.8 1R1G2F
79 58 46,XX,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [20] 85 1R1G2F
80 60 46,XX,del(7) (q22),t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [16]/46,XY[4] 47.6 1R1G2F
81 60 46,XY,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [20] 85.4 1R1G2F
82 68 46,XX,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [30] 94.8 1R1G2F
83 78 46,XX,t (11;19) (q23;p13.1) [20] 96.8 1R1G2F

F, fusion (yellow); G, green; M, months; R, red; W, weeks.

*

A total of 500 interphase nuclei were analyzed by two technologists (250 nuclei each).

The breakpoint for these patients was initially evaluated as 19p13.3.