Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Apr 19.
Published in final edited form as: Inorg Chem. 2010 Apr 19;49(8):3629–3645. doi: 10.1021/ic9020993

Figure 11.

Figure 11

a) EPR spectra recorded at 77 K of generated phenoxyl radicals by the reaction of [DCHIm(F8)FeIII-(O22-)-CuII(AN)]+ (2b) and 2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenol (A) or 2,4-di-tert-butyl-4-methoxylphenol (B) at -80° C in THF. As determined in separate experiments, at equal concentrations of a phenoxyl radical with a copper(II) complex, the radical g ~ 2 signal peak intensity is vastly greater than the peak intensities for the g ~ 2.0-to-2.3 signals resultant from the copper(II) ion due to the differences in peak width, which is why the latter is essentially not observable. Also, within the resolution of the EPR experiments conducted, the g-values are indistinguishable.90,91 b) UV-vis monitoring of the reaction of 2b with 2,4-di-tert-butyl-phenol at -80° C.