Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 29.
Published in final edited form as: J Res Adolesc. 2005;15(3):235–260. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7795.2005.00095.x

TABLE 1.

Means and Standard Deviations of Major Variables in the Analyses

Time of Assessment and Age of Participants

Measure T7 (15–16) T8 (17–18) T10 (21–22) T11 (23–24) T12 (25–26) Range of
Scores
Self-reported
    Helpinga 3.10 (.61) 3.23 (.57) 3.02 (.62) 3.01 (.46) 3.17 (.52) 1.85–4.69
    Sympathyb 3.94 (.77) 3.98 (.69) 3.87 (.69) 4.06 (.58) 3.99 (.61) 1.43–5.00
    Perspective takingb 3.39 (.70) 3.33 (.74) 3.63 (.70) 3.69 (.65) 3.74 (.72) 1.57–5.00
    Personal distressb 2.57 (.70) 2.35 (.64) 2.28 (.60) 2.25 (.49) 2.15 (.68) 1.00–4.14
Moral judgment
    Level 1c .15 (.11) .16 (.14) .13 (.12) .14 (.17) 0–.78
    Level 2c .43 (.22) .43 (.17) .24 (.09) .23 (.07) .05–1.00
    Level 3c .15 (.12) .17 (.12) .21 (.15) .23 (.16) 0–.75
    Level 4c .19 (.16) .15 (.11) .31 (.18) .27 (.16) 0–.65
    Level 5c .07 (.12) .10 (.11) .12 (.14) .12 (.12) 0–.55
    Composite scored 2.54 (.42) 2.60 (.35) 2.92 (.42) 2.87 (.45) 1.00–3.59

Note. Means are based on the participants who had data at all time periods (ns = .31 for questionnaires and ns = 28 for the prosocial moral interview). No T9 questionnaire scores were used because either the score was missing or rated on a scale that differed from other assessments.

a

Shortened version of Rushton et al.’s (1981) scale (5-point).

b

From the IRI (Davis, 1983); scored on a 5-point scale.

c

The levels are proportion scores.

d

This score can be multiplied by 100 to obtain scores similar to the summary scores used by Kohlberg and others studying justice-oriented moral reasoning.