Skip to main content
. 2010 Feb 9;4(2):61–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2009.00122.x

Table 3.

 Results of sample simulation runs

Simulation run number Overall serologic attack rate (%) Total number of health care workers infected Peak total population infections Distribution of where infections occurred
% of total infections in community % of total infections in households % of total infections in schools % of total infections in workplaces
1 33·3 5196 16 425 33·2 29·9 24·4 12·5
2 34·0 5325 16 476 33·2 30·1 24·1 12·6
3 34·1 5323 17 079 33·2 29·9 24·3 12·6
4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
5 34·0 5304 16 625 33·4 30·1 24·1 12·5
6 34·2 5374 16 474 33·2 30·0 24·1 12·6
7 33·7 5210 16 400 33·3 29·9 24·4 12·4
8 33·9 5225 16 813 33·4 29·9 24·4 12·4
9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
10 34·2 5324 16 994 33·4 30·0 24·1 12·5
*Ave 33·9 5285 16 661 33·3 30·0 24·2 12·5

*Ave = the average of the eight runs that resulted in an epidemic. Two of the 10 runs did not result in an epidemic and, based on a larger sample, an estimated 82% of runs would be realized. The runs covered a period of 124–140 days. Each run peaks on one of two Fridays (day 48 or 55) and estimated attack rate exhibits a small variance.