Table 1.
Summary of Evidence on Specific Candidate Explanatory Factors for the High Rates of Psychosis in Migrant and Minority Ethnic Groups
Candidate Explanatory Factorsa | Number of Studies | Findings | References |
Misdiagnosis | 3 | −, −, − | 16–18 |
Selective migration | 2 | −, − | 28,29 |
Genetic | 3 | −, −, − | 31–33 |
Neurodevelopmental | |||
Viral infection | 0 | ? | — |
Obstetric complications | 2 | −, − | 42–44 |
Vitamin D | 0 | ? | — |
Neurological markers | 1 | − | 47,48 |
Brain structure | 1 | + | 49 |
Substance use (primarily cannabis) | 4 | −, −, −, − | 52–55 |
Stressors premigration and during migration | 0 | ? | — |
(Psycho)social | |||
Childhood separation from parents | 2 | +, + | 19,59,60 |
Adult markers of disadvantage | 2 | +, + | 19,59,61 |
Discrimination—perceived | 3b | +, +, + | 63–65 |
Discrimination—reported | 1c | + | 62 |
Ethnic identity | 2 | +, + | 66,67 |
Ethnic density | 4 | +, +, +, + | 70–73 |
Urbanicity | 2 | −, − | 3,30 |
Note: Studies are not weighted in any way, and no account is taken of study quality. −, negative finding; +, positive finding; ?, no study with direct evidence for or against. A “−” or “+” is given for each study that has directly investigated the candidate explanatory factor.
Studies are only included in this table if they provide direct evidence in relation to a specific explanatory factor. Indirect evidence (eg, absence of high rates in originating countries of migrants suggesting no influence of genetics) is not included.
Includes one study of prevalent cases.
A study of prevalent cases.