Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: Epidemiology. 2005 Mar;16(2):220–225. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000152901.06689.d4

TABLE 1.

Comparison of Clustering in Kawasaki Syndrome and Simulated Data Sets

Kawasaki Syndrome
Geographic Region/Time Period Cluster Size* Percent of Cases
in Clusters
No. Clusters No. Simulated Clusters
(Mean ± SD)
Eastern Japan; January to June (n = 20,085) ≥39 4.9 162 129.8 (±6.7)
Eastern Japan; July to December (n = 18,743) ≥36 5.1 166 136.9 (±6.8)
Western Japan; January to June, (n = 24,089) ≥46 4.9 164 128.9 (±6.7)
Eastern Japan; July to December (n = 21,912) ≥41 5.6 179 150.7 (±6.7)
*

The cluster size was arbitrarily defined as the number of cases during a 4-day period that represented approximately 5% of the Kawasaki syndrome sample for 2 time-periods and 2 geographic regions.

SD indicates standard deviation.