Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Sports Med. 2009 May 29;37(9):1821–1830. doi: 10.1177/0363546509334225

TABLE 2.

Analysis of Variance Summary Results With Calculated Effect Sizes: Joint Kinematic and Moment Comparisons Between Women and Men With Below- and Above-Average Laxity Valuesa

Variable Women
 Men
Group Group × Time Group Group × Time
Joint kinematics
 HIPAA 0.041 (0.37) 0.002 (0.21) 0.029 (0.41) 0.675 (0.09)
 HIPIER 0.582 (0.10) <0.001 (0.28) 0.642 (0.08) 0.779 (0.09)
 KNEEVV 0.265 (0.20) 0.004 (0.21) 0.654 (0.08) 0.713 (0.10)
 KNEEIER 0.633 (0.08) 0.674 (0.09) 0.763 (0.05) 0.868 (0.04)
Joint moments
 HIPAA <0.001 (0.08) 0.002 (0.22) 0.530 (0.11) <0.001 (0.24)
 HIPIER 0.619 (0.09) 0.560 (0.17) 0.813 (0.05) 0.239 (0.19)
 KNEEVV 0.223 (0.22) 0.025 (0.20) 0.621 (0.27) <0.001 (0.09)
 KNEEIER 0.554 (0.11) 0.289 (0.17) 0.555 (0.11) <0.001 (0.25)
a

Effect size index is defined by square root × (sum of squares for the between-group or between-group × time term/sum-of-squares error term). Effect sizes of 0.10, 0.25, and 0.40 equate to small, medium, and large effects, respectively.4 HIPAA, hip abduction/adduction; HIPIER, hip internal/external rotation; KNEEVV, knee varus/valgus; KNEEIER, knee internal/external rotation.