Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 8;102(3):1699–1710. doi: 10.1152/jn.00072.2009

FIG. 8.

FIG. 8.

Effects of different depression models on BC spiking for irregularly firing inputs. A: example stimulus paradigm. The “stimulus” has a period of 200 Hz and the conductances of 5 inputs with firing rate of 100 Hz are illustrated below. B: average BC spiking probability in response to 2, 5, or 10 inputs with individual firing rates of 50, 100, or 200 Hz. C: BC jitter under the same conditions as in B. The jitter for individual inputs (0.8 ms, equivalent to R = 0.6) is marked by the dotted line. Results in B and C are averages of 11 experiments.