Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 14;277(1693):2531–2540. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0196

Table 2.

Heritability estimates using variance components and ANOVA-based methods. p-values are shown in italics (p < 0.001) and in bold (p < 0.05).

clones n ln transformed
p residualsa
p
H2 s.e. H2 s.e.
variance components
AS 24 151 0.39 0.16 0.0174 0.34 0.18 0.0406
CQ 25 174 0.17 0.13 0.08 0.04 0.12 0.3718
DHA 25 164 0.30 0.15 0.0278 0.25 0.16 0.0666
LUM 20 154 0.60 0.11 4.84 × 10−5 0.57 0.12 0.0002
MFQ 26 175 0.79 0.06 2.85 × 10−9 0.77 0.06 1.47 × 10−8
QN 20 151 0.65 0.10 7.56 × 10−5 0.62 0.11 8.50 × 10−5
PRR24 27 184 0 b 0.00 0.00 0.5
PRR48 27 184 0 b 0.03 0.10 0.3704
ANOVA
AS 24 61c 0.33 0.15 0.0123 0.27 0.15 0.0339
CQ 25 66c 0.22 0.14 0.0551 0.08 0.14 0.2730
DHA 25 64c 0.31 0.14 0.0143 0.25 0.15 0.0434
LUM 20 54c 0.56 0.13 <0.0001 0.52 0.14 0.0003
MFQ 26 69c 0.69 0.09 <0.0001 0.67 0.09 <0.0001
QN 20 55c 0.49 0.14 0.0004 0.52 0.13 0.0002
PRR24 27 74c 0.02 0.13 0.4148 0.09 0.13 0.2377
PRR48 27 74c −0.02 0.13 0.5408 0.05 0.13 0.3514

aResiduals were generated from multiple regression of phenotype against treatment regimen, patient age and gender.

bBoundary of parameter space encountered: s.e. and p-value not output by SOLAR.

cn is lower for the ANOVA as only CI parasites are used.