Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2010 Mar 29;21(5):380–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2010.01.004

Table 3. Gender-Based Interventions for Women Prisoners.

Type of Intervention Women-Centered Design Theory Type Effect on Outcomes
HIV Prevention
Magura, Kang, Shapiro, & O'Day (1995) 4 sessions addressed special vulnerabilities of drug-using women. None stated Educational No stated effect; Unsuccessful
El-Bassel, Ivanoff, Schilling, Borne, & Gilbert (1997) El-Bassel et al. (1995) 22 sessions on avoiding abusive relationships, assertiveness training, and negotiating safer sex. Broad-spectrum curriculum (e.g., workbooks, group sessions, and resource manual). Social-Cognitive, Health Beliefs, Problem Solving, Social Support & Network Enhancement Skills building, Educational, Attitudinal, Empowerment Improved relational skills (e.g., coping, emotional support, and negotiating safer sex) through woman-centered program.
St. Lawrence et al. (1997) 6 sessions involving dyads, modeling, and skills building in sex and drug refusal, partner negotiation, and sexual negotiation for Group 1; 6 open-ended discussions on self-empowerment in high risk contexts for Group 2. Gender Power, Social-Cognitive Empowerment, Reframing, Skills building Improved relational skills for both groups through shared learning and women-centered skills building (Group 1) and through self-empowerment techniques (Group 2).
Pomeroy, Kiam, & Abel (1999). 10 sessions consisting of didactic and supportive components for coping, confidence- and trust-building, decision-making, communication skills, planning, parenting, relationship building, and HIV-related information. Cognitive-Behavioral, Task-Centered Educational, Skills building, Planning Significant improvements in relational skills, coping, and perceptions of self-empowerment, but effectiveness in the natural world was not measured.
Havens et al. (2009) 6 sessions for relational intervention involving “myth-busting” in personal relationships. The myths included having sex without protection will strengthen my relationship, and; I only feel worthwhile if I am in a relationship.” Miller's Relational Model Skills building, Empowerment, Relational myth-busting Effects were not reported from this preliminary study
Prison Release
Kim et al. (1997) Standardized intervention for men and women in the Rhode Island state prison, with no gender-specific protocols for either male or female releasees. N/A Continuity of care and social services The purpose and outcomes of the intervention were neither gendered nor relational. The social support component might have been beneficial for HIV-infected women.
Freudenberg, Wilets, Greene, & Richie (1998) No gender-based components other than an exclusive focus on high-risk women releasees. N/A Continuity of care and social services Reduced recidivism and risky sex for target group was due to living in a highly-structured setting that fit the needs of high-risk women releasees.
Vigilante et al. (1999) Tailored to high-risk women with history of prostitution and commercial sex work. Relationship-building with physician and social worker, and with peer counselor who accompanied releasees to appointments. N/A Case management and social services Despite goals for relationship-building, 1-year gains were modest (12% less recidivism than comparison group). Follow-up was sporadic; high turnover rate among peer educators; lack of theoretical model might be a factor.
Needels, James-Burdumy, & Burghardt (2005) Specifically designed for self-empowerment through group meetings and case management. However, the target population included both men and women, and the intervention did not use gender-specific protocols or leaders. N/A Continuity of care and social services Lack of overall success might be related to lack of gender-specific protocols as well as to large N, broad goals, and limited post-release contact.