Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 16;19(6):1180–1190. doi: 10.1002/pro.394

Tabel III.

Comparison of MUGSR, FEATURE, and LIGSITECSC

FEATURE
Criteriaa MUGSR SEL leveragedb to MUGSR SEN leveraged to MUGSR Score cutoff 50.0 LIGSITECSC
One Hits 795 2270 5881 142 78
Correct hits 417 1188 2174 123 9
Predicted pockets 45 43 45 21 9
Sensitivity 94% 88% 94% 43% 19%
Selectivity 52% 52% 40% 87% 11%
Two Hits 795 1386 4706 142 78
Correct hits 341 599 1161 108 3
Predicted pockets 44 33 44 21 3
Sensitivity 90% 67% 90% 43% 6%
Selectivity 43% 43% 25% 76% 4%
Three Hits 795 1010 3282 142 78
Correct hits 221 286 469 77 1
Predicted pockets 38 29 38 20 1
Sensitivity 78% 59% 78% 41% 2%
Selectivity 28% 28% 13% 54% 1%
a

A hit is correct if it contains one (two, three) true ligand residues.

b

SEL of FEATURE is adjusted, by tuning the cutoff score, to be the same as that of MUGSR.