Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 4;38(Web Server issue):W35–W40. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq415

Table 1.

Hypothetical alignment of three sub-families to illustrate the SH scores (range from 0 to 1) and mR weights (range from −1 to 1)

Alignment position
Distance matrix
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 1 2 3
Group 1
    seq1 R E L A A K K A 2 4 4 6 7 5 7 7 6
    seq2 R E L A F K K I 2 4 3 6 7 4 7 6 6
    seq3 R E A A Y R K L 4 4 2 4 5 6 5 6 6
    seq4 R E A A F R K M 4 3 2 5 6 5 6 5 7
Group 2
    seq1 H N V A Y R K K 6 6 4 5 1 3 4 5 5
    seq2 H N V F Y R K K 7 7 5 6 1 4 3 4 4
    seq3 H N S A F K K K 5 4 6 5 3 4 6 5 5
Group 3
    seq1 H S F F Y R K Q 7 7 5 6 4 3 6 3 3
    seq2 H S M F F R K R 7 6 6 5 5 4 5 3 3
    seq3 H S M F Y K K S 6 6 6 7 5 4 5 3 3
SH 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.87 0.99 1.00 0.00
mR 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 −0.42 −0.19 0.00 0.50

The distance matrix is used by mR to find ‘nearest hits’ (within group; in bold italic) and ‘nearest misses’ (between groups; in bold) for each sequence.