Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 2.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2010 Apr;63(4):951–958. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22287

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4

Comparison of QISS MRA acquired in the pelvis with ECG gating and a time delay of 100 ms (left) versus pulse gating and a time delay of 0 (right). Note the dramatic worsening in image quality with pulse gating because the QI for inflow mainly overlaps the period of slow and/or reversed diastolic flow, whereas with ECG gating the QI mainly overlaps rapid forward systolic flow.