Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 2.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44(2):253–281. doi: 10.1080/10826080802347677

Table 7.

6-Month Follow-up Reported Risk Reduction Behavior Change as a Result of Talking with Someone from RAP

PHAs (n=98) CRs (n=157) Others (n=102)a Total (n=367) b
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) p c
Drug use risk reduction
    Cut down on drug use 63 (70.8) 80 (54.1) 38 (43.7) 183 (55.0) .001
    Started using rubber tips d 31 (83.8) 49 (72.1) 22 (51.2) 105 (67.7) .005
Drug injection risk reduction: e
    Cut back on syringe sharing 11 (57.9) 13 (37.1) 9 (42.9) 35 (44.9) .338
    More selective needle partners 5 (29.4) 5 (15.2) 2 (10.1) 13 (18.1) .271
    Cleaned with bleach 13 (61.9) 21 (51.2) 15 (53.6) 50 (53.2) .772
    Stopped all syringe sharing 9 (47.4) 7 (20.6) 4 (18.2) 21 (26.9) .060
    Stopped sharing cookers 11 (57.9) 8 (23.5) 4 (18.2) 24 (30.8) .011
Sexual risk reduction: f
    Used condoms 37 (57.8) 53 (52.5) 24 (39.3) 117 (50.4) .102
    Reduced # of sex partners 36 (64.3) 41 (42.7) 21 (38.9) 100 (47.2) .010
Health promotion:
    Talked to drug users about
            HIV prevention
81 (89.0) 54 (38.3) 20 (23.5) 158 (48.5) .000
    Talked to drug users about
            other health issues
78 (88.6) 59 (41.5) 18 (20.9) 157 (48.3) .000
a

Includes 76 CRs of all untrained PHAs (i.e., those who attended 0–4 training sessions) and 26 PHAs who never started the training; PHAs who attended 1–4 training sessions are excluded from this group.

b

Ten PHAs who attended only 1–4 sessions were included in the follow-up total.

c

Chi-square significance calculated across comparison groups for those who reported each preventive or health promotional behavior.

d

Calculated as percent who smoked crack at follow-up.

e

Calculated as percent who injected drugs at follow-up.

f

Calculated as percent who were sexually active at follow-up.