Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 27;25(8):865–872. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1327-8

Table 2.

Reliability of Respiratory Physical Examination Signs Elicited by Auscultation

Sign Inter-examiner reliabilitya Reference
Bronchial breathing 0.19 31
0.32 35
-0.14 to 0.14c 60
Whispering pectoriloquy 0.11 33
Whispering pectoriloquy 0.16 to 0.25c 60
Bronchophony -0.10 to 0.18c 60
Egophony b 25
Breath sound intensity "Differences among examiners–not statistically significant" 55
"29% disagreement" 22,26
Coefficient of correlation: 0.58 29
Coefficient of correlation: 0.97 29
0.16 31
0.23 to 0.43c 32
0.43 33
0.38 59
0.42 58
0.89 61
b 25,28
Rales/crackles/crepitations 0.36 31
0.32 58
0.30 to 0.63c 32
0.41 33
0.24 to 0.65c 60
0.67 61
b 25,28
Rhonchi 0.55 31
-0.06 to 0.18c 60
b 25
Vocal resonance (diminished) 0.78 61
b 25
Vocal resonance (increased) b 25
Wheezes 0.54 to 0.70c 32
0.51 33
0.50 59
0.43 58
0.85 34
-0.05 to 0.65c 60
b 28
Wheezing at maximal forced exhalation "90% agreement" 57
Expiratory phase (prolonged) 0.53 31
0.35 33
Pleural friction rub -0.02 31
0.51 33
-0.02 61

aUnless stated otherwise, the inter-examiner reliability is expressed as kappa

bInter-examiner reliability expressed as "standard deviation agreement index," and it was about midway between perfect agreement rates and those expected by chance alone

cRange of reproducibility between multiple pairs of examiners