Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoporos Int. 2009 Sep 15;21(6):919–929. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1056-1

Table 4.

Hazard ratiosa of hip fracture by the standardized HSA parametersb and the extracted factors from principal component analysis

Model Ac Model Bd Model Ce
Hazard ratio (95% CI) Hazard ratio (95% CI) Hazards ratio (95% CI)
Narrow neck
CSA 0.43 (0.34--0.56) 0.64 (0.46--0.88) 1.62 (0.97--2.70)
Outer diameter 1.23 (1.09--1.39) 1.27 (1.03--1.57) 1.13 (0.90--1.41)
Section modulus 0.53 (0.41--0.68) 0.66 (0.48--0.92) 1.08 (0.74--1.59)
Cortical thickness 0.41 (0.32--0.52) 0.58 (0.42--0.80) 1.35 (0.76--2.38)
Buckling ratio 1.72 (1.53--1.94) 1.50 (1.24--1.81) 1.11 (0.82--1.52)
Intertrochanter
CSA 0.41 (0.33--0.51) 0.59 (0.44--0.79) 0.92 (0.61--1.40)
Outer diameter 1.60 (1.33--1.92) 1.75 (1.37--2.24) 1.61 (1.25--2.08)
Section modulus 0.62 (0.50--0.78) 0.87 (0.66--1.15) 1.28 (0.93--1.76)
Cortical thickness 0.37 (0.30--0.47) 0.51 (0.38--0.69) 0.74 (0.48--1.16)
Buckling ratio 1.91 (1.69--2.17) 1.70 (1.41--2.05) 1.43 (1.10--1.87)
Shaft
CSA 0.50 (0.40--0.61) 0.63 (0.47--0.84) 0.95 (0.66--1.36)
Outer diameter 1.45 (1.21--1.73) 1.54 (1.21--1.97) 1.36 (1.06--1.76)
Section modulus 0.70 (0.56--0.87) 0.86 (0.64--1.15) 1.14 (0.83--1.56)
Cortical thickness 0.46 (0.37--0.57) 0.55 (0.41--074) 0.78 (0.54--1.13)
Buckling ratio 1.67 (1.48--1.89) 1.50 (1.27--1.78) 1.24 (1.00--1.55)
Conventional femoral neck aBMD 0.35 (0.28--0.45) 0.46 (0.32--0.64) N/A
Factor 1 0.45 (0.37--0.55) 0.61 (0.46--0.80) 0.81 (0.52--1.28)
Factor 2 1.38 (1.11--1.71) 1.59 (1.19--2.12) 1.57 (1.17--2.11)

HR for hip fracture with one SD difference in the HAS parameter or extracted factor NA not applicable

a

Hazards ratio for hip facture were estimated in separate models for each standardized HSA measurement and conventional femoral neck aBMD except for factors 1 and 2 which were included in the same models.

b

The HSA measurements and the conventional femoral neck aBMD were standardized by using the corresponding means and standard deviations.

c

Model A included age, ethnicity, weight, height, % lean mass and clinical trial.

d

Model B included age, ethnicity, weight, height, % lean mass, clinical trial, smoking, hormone use, corticosteroid use, general health, physical activity, fracture history, fracture on/after age 55, parent broke hip after 40 and diabetes.

e

Model C included age, ethnicity, weight, height, % lean mass, clinical trial, smoking, hormone use, corticosteroid use, general health, physical activity, fracture history, fracture on/after age 55, parent broke hip after 40, diabetes and conventional hip femoral neck aBMD.