Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2009 Dec 21;138(2):419–422. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.12.014

Table 2.

Ligands for optical labeling and imaging

Detection ligand Advantages Disadvantages
Whole antibody Easiest to formulate. Many clinically approved antibodies available for labeling. Long history of optical- and radio-labeling of antibodies. Long blood half-life decreases specificity of signal, especially before blood pool clearance of imaging agent
Engineered or chemically produced antibody fragments These structures retain high binding affinity. Clearance times well suited for imaging. Somewhat more complex to formulate compared to whole antibodies
Targeting peptides High throughput screening methods can yield high-specificity agents with rapid clearance times Somewhat more complex to formulate compared to whole antibodies
Small molecules High specificity, rapid clearance. Additional targets including intracellular targets, available for imaging Fluorochromes and their comparable size to small molecules may affect pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of the resulting labeled ligands