Skip to main content
. 2010 Jul;11(7):531–538. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B0900380

Table 2.

Distribution and reliability of PDQ-39 scoresa

PDQ-39 dimension/index Mean (SD)b Median (inter-quartile)c Floor/ceiling effect (%)d Cronbach’s αe Test-retest ICCf Success/total Scaling success rate (%)g
Mobility 33.73 (28.12) 30.0 (10.0, 52.5) 12.7/1.4 0.86 0.77 73/80 91.25
Activities daily living 28.35 (27.37) 20.8 (4.2, 41.7) 16.9/4.2 0.87 0.82 44/48 91.67
Emotional well-being 31.57 (22.29) 25.0 (16.7, 45.8) 4.2/0 0.87 0.62 42/48 87.50
Stigma 24.56 (27.49) 18.8 (0, 37.5) 32.4/1.4 0.88 0.67 29/32 90.63
Social support 19.48 (22.67) 16.7 (0, 33.3) 43.7/0 0.87 0.56 9/24 37.50
Cognitions 35.65 (21.74) 31.3 (18.8, 43.8) 2.8/2.8 0.87 0.71 8/32 25.00
Communication 28.64 (27.01) 16.7 (0, 58.3) 26.8/0 0.86 0.77 19/24 79.17
Bodily discomfort 35.09 (23.98) 25.0 (16.7, 50.0) 8.5/1.4 0.87 0.82 18/24 75.00

PDQ-39 summary index 29.63 (17.35) 29.1 (15.1, 39.6) 0/0 0.84 0.82
a

All data, except for test-retest reliability, were from the first time

b

Scores for all dimensions/summary indexes range from 0 to 100, with higher score indicating worse health-related quality of life (HRQOL)

c

The first figure in the bracket is P25 (the 25th percentile) and the second figure in the bracket is P75 (the 75th percentile)

d

Percentage scoring 0 (floor) and 100 (ceiling) should not exceed 15%

e

n=71

f

n=68. Agreement model intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) from scores of patients completing both administrations (7-d interval)

g

Percentage of occasions when items correlated significantly stronger with their proposed scale than with other scales