Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2003 Oct 16;5(21):4011–4014. doi: 10.1021/ol035647d

Table 1.

Optimization of Alkynylation Conditionsa

graphic file with name nihms214855t1.jpg

entry base CuZ solvent alkyne
equiv, X
yield
(%)b
1 KHMDS CuI pyr 1.0, I 44
2 KHMDS CuI pyr 1.0, Br 48
3 KHMDS CuI pyrc 1.0, Cl 23
4 KHMDS CuI DMF 1.0, Br 26
5 n-BuLi CuI pyr 1.0, Br 0
6 n-BuLi CuI DMSO 1.0, Br 20
7 n-BuLi CuTCd DMSO 1.0, Br 24
8 KHMDS CuI pyr 0.6, Br 40e
9 KHMDS CuI pyr 2.0, Br 67f
10 KHMDS CuCN pyr 2.0, Br 41
11 KHMDS CuI tol, diamineg 2.0, Br 40
12 KHMDS CuI pyr 5.0, Br 28h
a

All reactions were carried out at rt for 20 h unless otherwise indicated. Concentration of 8a (0.200 g scale) was 0.15 M. Alkynes were added as benzene solutions.

b

Isolated yields of products purified by column chromatography.

c

Reaction at 75 °C.

d

Copper(I) thiophene-2-carboxylate.

e

Yield based on 1-bromo-2-phenylethyne.

f

Yield improved to 76% when scale increased to 2.0 g of 8a.

g

4.0 equiv of diamine ligand MeN(H)CH2-CH2N(H)Me.

h

Reaction for 90 h.