Skip to main content
. 2010 May 17;54(7):2974–2978. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01582-09

TABLE 4.

Comparative operational settings and pharmacokinetic data from this study and previous studies of meropenem clearance during CVVHFa

Study (reference) Membrane SA (m2) BFR (liters/h) UFR (liters/h) SC t1/2 (h) V (liters/kg) CLCVVHF (liters/h) CLtot (liters/h) CLCVVHF/SA CLCVVHF/BFR CLCVVHF/UFR
Thalhammer et al., 1998 (23) 0.43 9 2.7 1.09 2.5 0.34 2.98 8.62 6.93 0.33 1.10
Tegeder et al., 1999 (21) 0.9 10 1.1 1.17 8.7 0.19 1.32 3.10 1.47 0.13 1.20
Ververs et al., 2000 (26) 0.9 12 1.6 0.63 6.3 0.37 0.96 4.57 1.07 0.08 0.60
Giles et al., 2000 (9) 0.9 9 1.7 0.95 5.8 0.35 1.50 3.63 1.67 0.17 0.88
Valtonen et al., 2000 (25) 0.7 6 0.4 NS 7.5 NS NS 3.27 NS NS NS
Krueger et al., 2003 (13) 0.9 1 1.6 0.91 3.6 0.28 1.47 4.98 1.63 1.47 0.92
Bilgrami et al., 2010 2.15 15 4.4 0.93 4.6 0.26 3.49 6.00 1.76 0.25 0.86
a

Abbreviations: SA, surface area; BFR, blood flow rate; UFR, ultrafiltrate flow rate; SC, sieving coefficient; t1/2, elimination half-life; V, stated apparent volume of distribution (V was at steady state in all studies except for references 23 and 25, which did not specify the value; in this study, the apparent V during terminal phase was used); CLCVVHF, hemofiltration clearance; CLtot, total clearance; NS, data not stated.