Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 19;11(2):140–157. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v11i2.3185

Table 4.

Percent difference/DTA comparison between EPID converted dose planes to 2D diode array measurements for seven designed test fields (Varian linac) and two analysis criteria (% difference/DTA) for 3 mm/3% and 2 mm/2% (DTA). The number of distinct diode measurement positions in the fields is shown, as some of these fields were quite small and did not cover many diodes in the MapCHECK array.

Field Description 3 mm/3% Pass Rate 2 mm/2% Pass Rate Points Analyzed
1.0×1.0 MLC, 10×10 Primary Jaws 100.0 100.0 6
1.5×2.0 MLC, 10×10 Primary Jaws 100.0 91.7 12
2.0×1.0 MLC, 10×10 Primary Jaws 100.0 93.3 15
3.0×3.0 MLC, 10×10 Primary Jaws 100.0 100.0 28
5.0×5.0 MLC, 10×10 Primary Jaws 97.1 91.3 69
7.0×7.0 MLC, 10×10 Primary Jaws 94.2 88.3 121
Inverted Dose Pyramid (11 MLC segments, fixed
10×10
Primary Jaws)
99.2 88.4 250