Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Virus Res. 2010 Apr 24;151(2):235–239. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2010.04.007

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Summary of yeast two hybrid screen results. Panel A shows a strong interaction phenotype for two human OS9 cDNAs (S2/hOS9 14.1.1 and S2/hOS9 10.1) and the weak interaction of phenotype of human PMCS3 with EIAVS2 in the yeast two hybrid screen. Also shown is the strong interaction phenotype of eqOS9 clone 10 with S2 and the lack of interaction between eqOS9 clone 2 and S2. Row A is a negative control (pPC97 and pPC86, Invitrogen, with no inserts); row E is the strong positive control (pCL1Gal4, Invitrogen). Panel B. Schematic representation of known OS9 isoforms 1 and 2 for comparison with cDNAs recovered from the yeast two hybrid screen. Fragments of equine OS9 tested in the yeast two hybrid assay are also shown.