Skip to main content
. 2010 Jan 26;88(7):535–542. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.066050

Table 2. Test of balance across treatment and control villages using pre-intervention (2005) data in study of community demand-directed water, sanitation and hygiene programme in Maharasthra, India.

Covariate of interest, mean/average value Treatment Control z-valuea
Based on secondary census data used in matching model
Percentage of children < 6 years old in village 17 16 0.74
Percentage of scheduled castes in village 10 8 1.78
Percentage of scheduled tribes in village 29 31 −0.36
Percentage of female workers in village 45 45 −0.05
Percentage of cultivators in village 49 52 −1.18
Percentage of agricultural labourers in village 39 34 1.55
No. of households in village 385 387 −0.03
Household size in village (no. of dwellers) 5 5 0.03
Percentage of literate females in village 52 54 −1.05
Percentage of households with private tap in block 42 42 0.07
Percentage of households without toilets in block 83 84 −0.49
Based on baseline (2005) household survey data
Percentage of children aged < 5 years with diarrhoea 11 10 1.62
Percentage of households using private tap 18 24 −1.55
Percentage of households using private toilet 13 10 0.96
No. of critical times a caregiver washed hands 2.3 2.4 −0.51
No. of critical times a child washed hands 1.1 1.2 −0.44
No. of households treating drinking water 64 63 0.11
No. of households stating public well water quality was poor 19 24 −1.77
No. of households stating public tap water quality was poor 24 22 0.44

a For mean differences after adjusting standard errors to account for clustering at the village level.

Data from Pattanayak et al., 2009.32