Table IV.
HEM treatment | Permeability coefficient of HEM for CS with enhancer/ethanol formulation (10−7cm/s)a | Lag time (min)a | Enhancement factorb |
---|---|---|---|
Control/Ethanol | 4±2 | 56±4 | NA |
DCA | 6±2 | NAc | 1.5±0.3 |
UDA | 10±3 | NAc | 2±2 |
LRA | 7±4 | 31±12 | 2.6±0.9 |
TDA | 6±3 | 36±16 | 1.4±0.6 |
MA | 6.3±0.5 | 46±15 | 3.7±0.7 |
PDA | 5±1 | 29±19 | 1.2±0.6 |
PA | 7±3 | 43±17 | 4±2 |
STA | 3±1 | 53±5 | 1.7±0.6 |
OL | 14±10 | 49±1 | 5±1 |
LA | 13±7 | 44±3 | 9±5 |
RCA | 10±2 | 23±7 | 2.7±0.9 |
Mean±SD (n ≥ 3) with at least three different skin donors
Enhancement factor determined with HEM after fatty acid/ethanol treatment (ethanol is the volatile carrier)
The lag time is not reported due to the large variability attributed to enhancer depletion in the transport experiment