Table 3.
Men | Women | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance score | Non-OA (N = 194) | OA (N = 36) | p Value | Non-OA (N = 122) | OA (N = 152) | p Value | |
Standing balance | 0 | 11 (5.7) | 3 (8.3) | 0.093 | 6 (4.9) | 11 (7.2) | 0.001 |
1 | 25 (12.9) | 5 (13.9) | 15 (12.3) | 30 (19.7) | |||
2 | 97 (50.0) | 24 (66.7) | 54 (44.3) | 85 (55.9) | |||
3 | 61 (31.4) | 4 (11.1) | 47 (38.5) | 26 (17.1) | |||
Usual walk | 0 | 43 (22.2) | 14 (38.9) | 0.163 | 22 (18.0) | 45 (29.6) | 0.007 |
1 | 49 (25.3) | 9 (25.0) | 26 (21.3) | 43 (28.3) | |||
2 | 51 (26.3) | 7 (19.4) | 33 (27.0) | 37 (24.3) | |||
3 | 51 (26.3) | 6 (16.7) | 41 (33.6) | 27 (17.8) | |||
Chair stands | 0 | 42 (21.6) | 15 (41.7) | 0.079 | 23 (18.9) | 46 (30.3) | 0.013 |
1 | 49 (25.3) | 8 (22.2) | 25 (20.5) | 43 (28.3) | |||
2 | 52 (26.8) | 7 (19.4) | 35 (28.7) | 34 (22.4) | |||
3 | 51 (26.3) | 6 (16.7) | 39 (32.0) | 29 (19.1) |
For standing balance, the subjects were given a score of 0-3 as described in the method. For the 6-m usual walk test and repeated chair stands, quartiles based on the performance of the study subjects were created.
Zero represents the worst and 3 represents the best performance. Values are the number (%). Distribution of categories between non-OA and OA was compared with Chi-square test.