Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 May;14(2):228–244. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.14.2.228

Table 5.

Conditional Latent Transition Probability Estimates for Three Cohorts (Young, Middle, Older) Shown as Row Percentages, 95% Confidence Intervals, and Estimated Cell n

Time 1
Ages 24–32 years
Time 2
Ages 29–37 years
No dependence
Mild alcohol dependence
Severe alcohol dependence
Marginal
Young Middle Older Young Middle Older Young Middle Older Young Middle Older
No dependence 88% 88% 92% 10% 11% 6% 2% 2% 2% 70% 78% 81%
85–92% 86–91% 89–95% 6–14% 8–12% 3–10% 1–4% 1–2% 1–4% 68–75% 76–82% 78–85%
801 1113 805 95 138 57 15 19 14 912 1269 876
Mild alcohol dependence 35% 43% 44% 54% 46% 50% 11% 11% 6% 25% 18% 17%
28–41% 36–52% 32–55% 46–61% 36–54% 41–61% 7–18% 7–18% 2–14% 21–27% 15–20% 12–19%
114 127 79 174 137 91 35 32 10 322 296 180
Severe alcohol dependence 0% 5% 0% 59% 46% 53% 41% 50% 47% 5% 4% 3%
0–24% 0–35% 0–39% 43–74% 28–70% 26–73% 24–55% 27–66% 24–69% 3–6% 3–5% 2–4%
1 3 0 35 32 15 24 30 14 59 60 29
Marginala 71% 76% 82% 24% 19% 15% 6% 5% 4%
916 1243 884 304 307 163 74 81 38 1293 1625 1085

Note. N = 4,003. Young n = 1,293; middle n = 1,625; older n = 1,085.

a

Standard errors are not computed for Time 2 marginals in WinLTA.