Skip to main content
. 2010 May 20;9:23. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-23

Table 5.

Exposure predictions for different strata.

Variable Category n Coefficient 95%-CI p-value
Age young adults (20-34 y) 56 reference - -
adults (35-64) 69 0.77 0.59;1.01 0.06
retired people (>64) 6 0.75 0.39;1.42 0.37

Gender Female 74 reference - -
Male 57 0.93 0.72;1.20 0.58

Place of residence Urban 76 reference - -
Suburban 55 1.27 0.97;1.66 0.08

Ownership of mobile phone Yes 119 reference - -
No 12 0.70 0.44;1.11 0.13

Ownership of cordless phone Yes 79 reference - -
No 52 0.91 0.68;1.21 0.51

Ownership of W-LAN Yes 50 reference - -
No 81 0.95 0.72;1.25 0.72

Socio economic status Low 21 reference - -
Middle 17 0.87 0.54;1.39 0.55
High 93 1.10 0.77;1.58 0.59

Coefficients of a multiple loglinear regression model using data from a Swiss RF-EMF population survey [15]. This model allows predicting average RF-EMF exposure in different population strata

Intercept of the model: 0.11 mW/m2 (95%-CI: 0.08-0.17) (exposure during the day of a female person aged 20-34 living in an urban environment, owning a mobile phone, a cordless phone and wireless LAN at home, with the lowest socioeconomic status).

To calculate total exposure of a woman with the same characteristics but who does not own a mobile phone, the value has to be multiplied by 0.70 resulting in an exposure of 0.08 mW/m2. Note that this is only an example to demonstrate the principle of an exposure prediction model. Lack of significance of coefficients for potentially relevant parameters may indicate that a larger sample size is needed for this type of exposure prediction model.