Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 12;9:29. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-9-29

Table 3.

Association of MSA segregation and very preterm birth among Black and White mothers, 231

MSAs
Main effect of segregation Main effect of race Segregation × Race Interaction Model Fit (Deviance)



RR 95% CI RR 95% CI RR 95% CI

BASELINE 3.11 3.07 3.15 2104
Continuous
 Dissimilarity
  Tract 0.91 0.83 1.00 2.96 2.92 3.01 1.68 1.52 1.87 1990
  500 m 0.95 0.85 1.07 2.96 2.92 3.01 2.12 1.84 2.43 1948
  4000 m 0.95 0.87 1.05 2.99 2.94 3.03 1.69 1.50 1.89 2001
 Isolation
  Tract 0.91 0.86 0.96 2.91 2.86 2.96 1.51 1.40 1.62 1967
  500 m 0.96 0.91 1.01 2.91 2.87 2.96 1.52 1.41 1.64 1963
  4000 m 0.93 0.88 0.98 2.93 2.88 2.98 1.44 1.34 1.54 1990
Binary
 Dissimilarity
  Tract 0.97 0.95 0.99 2.91 2.85 2.97 1.11 1.08 1.14 2038
  500 m 0.98 0.95 1.01 2.80 2.69 2.91 1.12 1.08 1.17 2067
  4000 m 0.97 0.95 0.99 2.99 2.94 3.05 1.08 1.06 1.11 2062
 Isolation
  Tract 0.96 0.93 0.98 3.00 2.95 3.04 1.17 1.13 1.20 1978
  500 m 0.96 0.94 0.98 2.97 2.92 3.01 1.13 1.10 1.16 2011
  4000 m 0.91 0.88 0.94 3.03 2.99 3.07 1.18 1.14 1.22 2022

NOTE: Race is coded Black = 1, White = 0, and all continuous segregation indices are mean-centered so that the main effect of segregation is the effect for white women only, and the main effect of race is the excess relative risk for black as compared with white women at average segregation levels (e.g. mean-centered segregation equals zero for in an MSA with average level of segregation). The interaction term is then the excess relative risk for black women in the most compared with the least segregated MSAs. All models are adjusted for census region and MSA population size.

† Dissimilarity index dichotomized into low (< 0.6) = 0, and high (≥0.6) = 1. Isolation index dichotomized at 0.7

Data source: National Center for Health Statistics; all singleton live births to non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black mothers in 231 US MSA's, 2000-2002