Skip to main content
. 2010 Mar 1;118(6):769–775. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901631

Table 4.

Linear models for effect of 10-min exposure measures on respiratory function, by stress group.a

Exposure, respiratory measure β-Value (p-value)
p-Value for interactionb
Stressed Nonstressed
PM2.5 mass (μg/m3)
 Frequency 14.0 × 10−3 (0.001) −0.41 × 10−3 (0.92) 0.01
 TI −30.0 × 10−6 (< 0.0001) −1.71 × 10−6 (0.69) < 0.0001
 TE −5.0 × 10−5 (< 0.0001) 0.29 × 10−5 (0.73) < 0.0001
 PIF −1.9 × 10−3 (0.17) 3.0 × 10−3 (0.03) 0.01
 PEF −3.9 × 10−3 (0.003) 0.13 × 10−3 (0.92) 0.03
 TV −7.3 × 10−4 (0.0001) 0.51 × 10−4 (0.79) 0.004
 MV −0.040 (0.06) 0.042 (0.05) 0.007

BC (μg/m3)
 Frequency 5.4 × 10−4 (0.0003) 0.6 × 10−4 (0.68) 0.02
 TI −1.0 × 10−6 (< 0.0001) −0.17 × 10−6 (< 0.0001) < 0.0001
 TE −0.16 × 10−7 (< 0.0001) 0.636 × 10−7 (< 0.0001) < 0.0001
 PIF 6.0 × 10−5 (0.22) 8.3 × 10−5 (0.10) 0.04
 PEF −14.0 × 10−5 (0.003) 4.0 × 10−5 (0.42) 0.12
 TV −2.0 × 10−5 (0.0007) −0.33 × 10−5 (0.64) 0.04
 MV −13.0 × 10−4 (0.096) 9.26 × 10−4 (0.22) 0.04

PM count (no./cm3)
 Frequency 15.0 × 10−2 (0.19) −0.97 × 10−2 (0.93) 0.32
 TI −7.4 × 10−4 (< 0.0001) −1.6 × 10−4 (0.18) 0.0006
 TE −10.0 × 10−4 (< 0.0001) 0.4 × 10−4 (0.86) 0.004
 PIF −0.05 (0.18) 0.12 (0.002) 0.001
 PEF −0.115 (0.002) 0.019 (0.61) 0.009
 TV −0.014 (0.006) −0.005 (0.38) 0.20
 MV −1.09 (0.07) 1.60 (0.07) 0.001
a

Models were adjusted for continuous animal age and cumulative stress exposure in weeks, at each CAPs/FA exposure.

b

The p-value for interaction is derived from Equation 2 and refers to the significance for the difference in CAPs response (per μg/m3) by stress group.