Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010 Apr 11;4(4):258–266. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.04.003

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Average relative difference in Hounsfield Unit attenuation between areas of infarcted myocardium and areas of remote normal myocardium. Segments processed with the MinIP technique had a significantly greater relative difference than segments processed with thin MPR or thick MPR, which in turn had a significantly greater difference than segments processed with the MIP techniques. There was no significant difference between segments processed with the thin MPR and thick MPR techniques.